Use stateless services with context
Problem statement
We want our services to be composable, so that one service can call another. We also want to be able to have a per request trace id associated with a logger so that we can correlate log messages in a single request.
Right now, most services are initialized with a database connection pool and a logger.
When using the database/sql
package, each database
request uses a different connection to the database. Some of our
services start transactions and then want to call other services. The
"sub-service" uses its own connection pool and thus does not have
visibility to the changes made within the transaction.
Some services have a way to set the connection used the service, but since we have a single service object, it seems almost certain that with goroutines handling each request that we'll have errors when multiple requests are running simultaneously.
The same problem exists for logging because services are logging using the "global" logger and not one initialized per request. That means service logs don't include the per request trace id.
Considered Alternatives
- Modify all service methods to accept a custom interface
- Modify all service methods to accept both a
Context
and a custom interface - Modify all service methods to accept a
Context
- Do nothing
Decision Outcome
- Chosen Alternative: Modify all service methods to accept a custom interface
Pros and Cons of the Alternatives
Modify all service methods to accept a custom interface
+
Services can be composed, calling each other and passing transaction connections around if necessary+
A custom interface provides ease of use and type safety, easy extensibility in the future, and mocking if necessary+
Modifying all service methods means implementers and consumers don't have to think about what the method signature should be. It also ensures all are available in case the implementation changes and they are now needed+
Services that log now can include the per request trace id+
A single argument is passed+
For instrumentation, the opentelemetry api needs aContext
and we can easily extend the custom interface to include that.=
Go best practice is a bit unclear on whether it is okay to include aContext
in a struct that is used as an argument to an API. It seems like including aContext
is pretty reasonable for APIs that are only used internal to the project.
Modify all service methods to accept both a Context
and a custom interface
+
Services can be composed, calling each other and passing transaction connections around if necessary+
Modifying all service methods means implementers and consumers don't have to think about what the method signature should be. It also ensures the necessary info is available in case the implementation changes and they are now needed+
Services that log now can include the per request trace id+
For instrumentation, the opentelemetry api needs a context+
AContext
does not provide type safety, so passing both provides a lot more compile time checking.-
Passing two arguments instead of one
The need for the context for instrumentation means we really have to pass the context around. Passing two arguments is pretty ugly and has some significant negatives for developer experience.
Modify all service methods to accept a Context
+
Services can be composed, calling each other and passing transaction connections around if necessary+
A custom interface provides ease of use and type safety, easy extensibility in the future, and mocking if necessary+
Modifying all service methods means implementers and consumers don't have to think about what the method signature should be. It also ensures all are available in case the implementation changes and they are now needed+
Services that log now can include the per request trace id+
For instrumentation, the opentelemetry api needs a context+
A single argument is passed-
AContext
does not provide type safety, so there's no way to know at compile time if aContext
has the required parameters (connection, logger). Because this is a massive change (~8000 lines changed), not having compile time safety significantly increases the risk.
The loss of type safety is not worth the "cost" of not including a
Context
in a custom argument.
Do nothing
+
Makes things no worse-
Our current approach will almost certainly result in errors when multiple requests are handled simultaneously-
Our current approach doesn't allow our services to call other services from inside transactions-
Our current approach doesn't allow for instrumentation or logging per request trace ids.
This option really isn't realistic.